I do such an assumption

I do such an assumption. For example, I killed 10 people, grabbed their homes, I got 100 people, grabbed their possessions, I still persecuted 100 people as slaves for I like ostriches. Because I pose "I am rascal I am afraid who" manner, no one dare to offend me. Hence, I make a fortune. Then I passed to the wealth of my offspring, and then, my future generations of a hand to was I kill, I rob, be I enslaved to the descendants of tao a modest. So, my offspring of property by inheritance is completely wash white, legal, and everything is normal. Such doing can? Americans do. For example, 1993, the United States government for that year to overthrow Hawaii king Hawaiian aborigines apology. Absolutely too hypocritical. Since overthrow Hawaii king wrong, why not take Hawaii back to native? Somebody else Hawaii king seed also in! But also do still required to take it back to his kingdom and then independence! Americans apology result? Still accounts for the somebody else's territory. I am wrong, but I just don't correct!
Western law concerning property, right ordiance is very clear, I didn't see what a law: as long as apology can will deprive others' property right, right of behavior legalized. But we also know, American law belongs to case law. As long as there is this case opened the head, the future, all similar problem, can according to this abhorrently: as long as apology, done. Looking at it, westerners apologies will more and more. I don't go to scour the one, in general, western governments, local governments, personal, etc., to record of national apology non-west roughly: to aboriginal australians Maori apology to black apology to the indians apology, apologize to the Chinese people and to the Hawaiian apology to the jews apology,...
List list down can discover, western almost extremely brutal rudely infringe bullying had many many nationalities, these are infringed, be humiliate national, facing western apologies, should accept? Look at the jews. West direction jews, not just say it apologize, but give the jews a piece of land, gave the jews a lot of money, gave the jews many material and spiritual support. Also by western bullying people, why treatment so different? Western only to the jews apology, rhetorical real and, in addition, are only moving lip service. Therefore, the national, whether by apologizing should also cites the western to the jews in both material and spiritual double apology cases, ask to be treated with the same fair treatment? Otherwise, facing the westerners apology, only refused. Don't just take useless words insincerely deceive people! http://www.mbtusafootwear.com/